The radical Muslims in a conflict with Kants categorical imperative

As if the Muslim religion did not have enough problems less often than the text of the Koran mutually tolerant, now they have run afoul of its radical members of Kant's categorical imperative in mind.

How?

As Muslim murderers Muslim, the war between Sunnis and Shiites each claim that their religion supports their bloody sectarianism. To the extent that it does, it goes against K categorical imperative, which, as every schoolchild is taught in America at the age of five years, says: "Act only according to the maximum for which it is possible, at the same time will that it should become a universal law. "In other words, a good example, in fact, in a praiseworthy way, all we can enter into a

Now, imagine if the Muslim Manifesto for chaos has become a universal standard of behavior. Instead of principles sanctified by religion, their intolerance flamboyant sounds more like improvised bylaws for Murder Incorporated.

So what we have, especially among the extremists who advocate a caliphate throughout the world by decapitating all those who disagree with their beliefs, but the ultimate test by Immanuel Kant that such an idea necessarily disqualify himself.

If everyone thinks like them, it would be good for everyone to kill anyone who is not exactly agree with, in their sentences murderer, is a true believer in Mohammed or whatever.

Certainly, if Muhammad were involved in the propagation of his followers more than the fighting between Muslims in Iraq, via Al-Qaeda or not enough to pull him to his tent.

And just as certainly would IK spin as he viewed the starry night on the contradictory nature of desire to do a universal religion, when, given the activities of its most ardent supporters irrational, can not possibly become a universal standard of behavior.

What we see instead of the true intent of religion is self-destructive stupidity.

To appease their fury convinced extremists could include a conversation between Muhammad and Kant, in which Muhammad expressed his hopes for the future of his religion and Kant warns that any beliefs that encourage the murder would exclude religion from the spread of larger than might carelessly.

Thus the sides were placed: the fanaticism of Muslim warriors, all brandishing insults irreligious can wangle out of it and the eternal truth of great ethics of Kant.

That the imperative to win the hatred of the last grain of sand in the blood, innocent or guilty, they can absorb.